• Phone: 855.MONTAUK (666.8285)
  • Email: upside@themontaukgroup.com

It’s Time To Clean Your BRM Closet

Relationship pricing is a blessing and a curse to those in Treasury. Large companies enjoy getting relationship discounts from a single bank, but at the same time struggle because no two banks’ bills (account analyses) are alike. Determining whether they are getting a fair deal from one bank by comparing it to another is a daunting task that takes time, expertise, and patience to perform.

Last week we spoke at the TEXPO conference with FISERV/Open Solutions and AT&T about this very subject. In two weeks, Steve Weiland, representing The Montauk Group, will be speaking again on the topic in Chicago at the Windy City Summit. No matter how you sugar-coat the project, or claim it can all be automated, or swear by the effectiveness of AFP codes, cross-bank comparison projects are a chore.

Going through the exercise is like taking every piece of clothing out of your closet, looking at it, sorting it, and thinking about how much you’ve used/worn it. After all shorts, pants, shirts, shoes, belts, hats, etc have been properly classified by color, use, and effectiveness, you have to make the decision to keep, donate, or trash each item, and in some cases buy new items. Some decisions are obvious – “Do I really need 10 blue shirts?” Some are hard – “This shirt has a lot of sentimental value but I’ll never wear it, do I keep it?” Some discoveries are fun- “Oh, I forgot about that!” Some lead to shopping to replace things that are just worn out. At the end of the exercise, you will be exhausted, but you’ll know exactly what and why you have everything in your closet.

A cross-bank comparison exercise is a cleaning of your banking services closet. Each company needs to take a hard look at each line item to determine what they have and why they have it. You won’t be tempted to add new services you don’t need if you know and understand what you already have. Instead, you’ll shop to replace services that are outdated or worn out and make your overall experience more efficient, less costly, and sensible.

Are you ready to dive in?

Product Manager, Bank Relationship Management Services
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

Who is the best bank for me today? Ask me tomorrow.

At Montauk, our clients often ask us “Who is the most competitive bank for my company today?”

The problem with the possible answer to that question is that what may be the case today may be the complete opposite tomorrow.

Deposits are a simple example of this erraticism. One day banks are aggressively pursuing deposits. The next day they need to shed deposits.

How could this be? Shouldn’t banks have an insatiable appetite for cash deposits? Not necessarily. The attached article demonstrates the balancing act that all banks – large and small – must perform each and every day. In this case, Citibank needs to reduce it’s cash on deposit so that it isn’t paying out interest on cash that it can’t put to use.

So how do these necessary ebbs and flows push down to your relationship managers? Retracted proposals, reduced ECR’s, and higher fees.

Who is the best bank for you today? Ask me tomorrow.

Read More:  Analysis: Citigroup looks to cut cash holdings to boost earnings

Managing Partner
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

A Stark Reminder From Cyprus

When you look at the blog postings and news at the end of 2012, the hot topic was the expiration of unlimited FDIC coverage. Treasurers scrambled to determine what, if anything, to do with their millions in cash held on deposit. Three months later, the FDIC expiration is “old news” and very few treasurers would admit that they made any real changes. Banks continue to pass through an FDIC assessment on full balances yet the corporation is only receiving $250,000 in insurance. Even with that disparity, a sense of general acceptance has already replaced the fourth quarter sense of urgency as priorities shift to other projects scheduled for 2013.

Today’s announcement from Cyprus should shake up our complacency as companies and individuals face enormous losses with the closure of largely state-owned Popular Bank of Cyprus, also known as Laiki. The government will shift deposits below 100,000 euros to the Bank of Cyprus while the level of losses on uninsured depositors will be “under or around 30 percent.” While Cyprus has had a myriad of problems and some may say they had this coming, can we truly say that our banking network has fully recovered and is flawless?

Read More: Cyprus reaches last-minute deal on 10 billion euro bailout

Managing Partner
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

Where Dodd-Frank has not succeeded yet (or possibly ever), a new bill may fill in some of the gaps.

But will Congress agree to collaborate and do something?

In an effort to level the playing field for regional banks and eliminate the ever-growing systemic risk to the economy from Too Big To Fail banks, U.S. Representative John Campbell introduced a bill that requires banks with at least $50 billion in assets to hold an additional layer of capital in the form of subordinated long-term bonds totaling at least 15 percent of consolidated assets. The move will make doing business more expensive for these “super-sized” banks, and the Congressman is hoping the result will be a contraction of the nation’s largest banks. JPMC, Bank of America, and Wells Fargo have steadily grown since 2007 and will continue to be a threat to the economy if they are allowed to continue – at least that is what the attached article and the proposed bill are implying.

If you are a corporate treasurer, how would this bill affect you? Our opinion is that the impact will be that these super-sized banks will do what they always have done: pass on their increased costs via an increase in pricing of treasury services. In other words, these super-sized banks will need to find ways to compensate for the loss of income imposed by a Federal Regulation. Risk ratings and profitability will need to be closely monitored as the banks struggle to adjust and comply. If the bill is passed, you might want to help in their “contraction” by moving some of your business to other banks whose safety is not mitigated nor costs impacted by such regulations.

Read More: Bill to Limit Too-Big-to-Fail Risk Is Readied in U.S. House

Managing Partner
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

Canada Pulls the Penny. Will the U.S. be next?

The value of a penny is so low that we don’t even bother picking one up off the parking lot when we see one. Retailers pay $0.08 per roll to order pennies and $0.0012 for every dollar of coin and currency deposited. If the U.S. follows suit with Canada, how much would we really be “saving” from the elimination of pennies. As a taxpayer, the answer is billions. As a retailer, not so much. The implementation of a “rounding” system will cost thousands to implement, but the end result just may be worth it.

Read More: Canada Pulls the Plug on the Penny

Product Manager, Bank Relationship Management Services
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

Online Banking Blackouts, A Treasurer’s Worst Nightmare.

When the unthinkable happens and the online banking portal we all have come to depend on suddenly goes dark (like it did for Bank of America customers on Friday), the contingency plans are put to the test. When was the last time you looked at yours? I remember spending hours preparing for the Y2K that never happened and testing and retesting policies and procedures to protect the US Treasury from bank blackouts. As our dependency on online banking grows, recognizing and testing the alternatives with your banks is critical to your business. Don’t wait for a natural disaster to have that conversation, even Super Bowls go dark in sunny weather.

Read More : Bank of America hit by website crash in the US

Product Manager, Bank Relationship Management Services
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

The 822, the TWIST BSB, the ISO BSB – What’s It All About?

Wouldn’t it be nice to have all commercial account bank billing statements, domestic and foreign, available in a standard, electronic format? Then “electronic eyes” could check for billing errors, detect unused services, examine balance usage, bill services to the appropriate departments, aggregate costs on a global basis, budget for the future, analyze trends over time, compare prices, pay bills and get rid of all those mounds of paper statements and 300 page PDFs. The vision has become reality, and with the recent announcement of the ISO 20022 electronic billing statement standard, all this and more are now at your fingertips.

In 2010 a group of bankers, corporations, SWIFT and ISO (International Standards Organization) came together to enhance and assume ownership of the modified TWIST BSB standard. Then, the AFP developed a new set of common, global service codes to be used in the new standard. Now, after two years of development, the new ISO 20022 BSB global electronic statement standard, known as “camt.086”, is fully documented and available on the ISO web page. http://www.iso20022.org/payments_messages.page#payments_catalogue_bsb

It is globally useable, features the AFP Global Service Codes™, and bears the ISO stamp of approval. The question no longer is “Wouldn’t it be nice?” but rather, “Which of my banks are committed to the BSB” and “When can I expect to receive it?”.

Senior Advisor
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

Corporate Treasurer Survey Results 2012

The Montauk Group conducted a survey designed for corporate treasurers in order to capture the level of their awareness surrounding the rates and fees their company is currently experiencing at their existing banks. Responders were asked about the different tools they use to manage their bank relationships and their perceptions on fairness, balance, and control within their current bank relationships.

We had 163 corporate treasurers complete the survey on ipads at the TEXPO, TMANE, TMANY, and Windy City Conferences. Over 30 different industries were represented and the results may surprise you.

Click here to view the results.

Moral Hazard, Too Big To Fail & An Unfair Competitive Advantage

The economic and business events leading up to the week of September 14th, 2008, followed by the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the US government’s actions immediately thereafter, have led us to an interesting if not terrifying milestone that is quickly approaching. On January 1, 2013, the FDIC’s unlimited insurance program will have expired. This means that balances in commercial Demand Deposit Accounts will only be guaranteed up to $250,000.

In early 2008, as Bear Stearns was failing, the US government stepped in to backstop JPMorgan Chase’s purchase of Bear Stearns – at $3 per share. Share owners of Bear were so upset by this low price, they successfully lobbied for the “buyout” price (if you would call it that) to increase to $10 per share, with the government still backstopping it. Even with looming bankruptcy and shares that would be worthless, shareholders felt that $3 was too low a price; the government agreed. Fast-forward 5 months and banks like Citibank and JPMorgan Chase made a decision to pull its intra-day credit lines to Lehman Brothers – this directly contributed to Lehman’s demise. Days later, as a direct result of Lehman’s bankruptcy, AIG itself was on the brink, which would have led to the rest of the dominos (i.e., the other banks) falling. Goldman Sachs: GONE. Morgan Stanley: GONE. The reason is, the billions of dollars in credit default swaps that AIG wrote and sold to these other banks would become worthless with an AIG bankruptcy. Hence, the balance sheet of many of AIG’s trading partners would have been decimated. Read More →

Fear Factor plays a big role in January plans for corporate treasurers

Banks shoudn’t underestimate the Fear Factor motivating their corporate clients to remove deposits from their DDAs come January. 50% of treasurers plan to move money out of their DDAs because they still fear that their bank may default. No one cancels their flood insurance 2 years after they’ve experienced a real flood. Many feel that the bigger the bank, the less likely to fail, or at least the less likely the Government will allow them to fail. Isn’t this why we all invest in T-bills? We really don’t fear that our US Government will fail. Our corporate investment policies allow for “safe” Treasury securities because we believe that if a security is backed by the Government, it is safe. I don’t need to tell you that the Government’s balance sheet is significantly worse than any of the banks in your portfolio. Yet, we want to believe that the United States and all it stands for will never default or fail. If only we were able to have the same confidence in our banks…

Product Manager, Bank Relationship Management Services
The Montauk Group, LLC.
390 Plandome Road, Suite 209, Manhasset, NY 11030

Older Posts